AI Study : What AI says about Real Madrid’s elections
Comparative analysis of the responses provided by three artificial intelligence systems —ChatGPT (GPT-5.5), Perplexity (Sonar), and AI Mode— to 25 identical questions about the Real Madrid C.F. presidential elections, held on June 7, 2026.
About the study
The study analyzes how ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Mode respond to 25 questions about the Real Madrid elections, comparing their similarities, differences, and ways of interpreting information. All three models identify Florentino Pérez as the clear favorite, while Enrique Riquelme appears as a real alternative, but with limited chances. The study also shows that each AI prioritizes different factors: ChatGPT goes deeper into governance and context, Perplexity provides stronger source traceability, and AI Mode better captures the pulse of social media and digital media.
What will you find
How AI analyzes a historic Real Madrid election
The study compares the responses given by ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Mode to 25 questions about the Real Madrid presidential elections. The aim is to understand how each model interprets a process marked by the return of electoral competition, Florentino Pérez’s institutional weight, and the emergence of Enrique Riquelme as an alternative.
The models’ consensus: Florentino as the clear favorite
All three systems agree in identifying Florentino Pérez as the candidate with the strongest advantage, supported by his track record, economic management, and institutional influence. The report shows how AI identifies a dominant position, while also recognizing that Riquelme’s candidacy brings debate and visibility to the process.
Riquelme as a real alternative, but with limits
The study analyzes how the models assess Enrique Riquelme: not as a merely symbolic candidate, but as an option capable of activating a competitive election after years without real opposition. Even so, the AIs agree that his chances of victory are limited against Florentino’s experience and recognition.
Transfers, promises, and electoral campaign
The report examines the role of transfer promises, major names, and media strategies within the campaign. All three models agree that these announcements can generate electoral impact, but also warn that their credibility depends on real agreements, sporting context, and execution capacity.
Differences between ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Mode
The comparison shows that each AI responds from a different angle: ChatGPT offers greater analytical depth and historical context, Perplexity stands out for source traceability, and AI Mode provides a perspective more connected to social media and digital conversation. This difference helps explain how the narrative changes depending on the model consulted.
What AI reveals about reputation, power, and influence
Beyond the electoral result, the study shows how artificial intelligence interprets leadership, credibility, communication, and public perception in a global club. The analysis shows that AI does not only summarize information: it also ranks priorities, detects narratives, and shapes how a brand, institution, or candidate is perceived.
Fill out the form
and download the study
The global butterfly effect of a geopolitical conflict.
Share study
Take the leap into the new era of organic visibility
Boost your brand presence on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and the new AI environments where purchasing decisions are already being made.